Brand overview
Pick a brand to see how it performs across every category it competes in.
Computed overviews
17 computations, newest first — open one to see its category scores again
| Brand | Visibility | Change | Categories | Scope | Computed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| miele3 too thin to score | 34.7 | unchanged | 14 of 17 scored82% of demand covered | Search surfacesAll · demand-weighted | 9/25/2026took 5.9s | |
| sony11 too thin to score | 27.6 | unchanged | 36 of 47 scored76% of demand covered | Search surfacesAll · demand-weighted | 9/25/2026took 15.4s | |
| philips19 too thin to score | 26.4 | unchanged | 45 of 64 scored46% of demand covered | Search surfacesAll · demand-weighted | 9/9/2026took 20.1s | |
| bose5 too thin to score | 25.9 | unchanged | 5 of 10 scored62% of demand covered | Search surfacesAll · demand-weighted | 9/9/2026took 3.5s | |
| 5 too thin to score | 25.9 | first run | 5 of 10 scored62% of demand covered | Search surfacesAll · demand-weighted | 9/9/2026took 3.5s | |
| 3 too thin to score | 34.7 | first run | 14 of 17 scored82% of demand covered | Search surfacesAll · demand-weighted | 9/3/2026took 5.7s | |
| 19 too thin to score | 26.4 | first run | 45 of 64 scored46% of demand covered | Search surfacesAll · demand-weighted | 9/3/2026took 19.8s | |
| xiaomi26 too thin to score | 15.1 | first run | 24 of 50 scored53% of demand covered | Search surfacesAll · demand-weighted | 8/31/2026took 16.2s | |
| babyliss1 too thin to score | 9.4 | first run | 8 of 9 scored83% of demand covered | Search surfacesAll · demand-weighted | 8/27/2026took 2.8s | |
| babyliss9 too thin to score | — | first run | 0 of 9 scored0% of demand covered | Named AI models5 selected | 8/27/2026took 0.8s | |
| 11 too thin to score | 27.6 | first run | 36 of 47 scored76% of demand covered | Search surfacesAll · demand-weighted | 8/26/2026took 15.2s | |
| logitech5 too thin to score | 27.6 | first run | 11 of 16 scored85% of demand covered | Search surfacesAll · demand-weighted | 8/26/2026took 5.0s | |
| bosch15 too thin to score | 49.3 | first run | 92 of 107 scored71% of demand covered | Search surfacesAll · demand-weighted | 8/26/2026took 34.7s | |
| samsung11 too thin to score | 45.3 | first run | 40 of 51 scored80% of demand covered | Search surfacesAll · demand-weighted | 8/26/2026took 16.6s | |
| apple8 too thin to score | 55.7 | first run | 23 of 31 scored80% of demand covered | Search surfacesAll · demand-weighted | 8/25/2026took 10.4s | |
| garmin12 too thin to score | 36.6 | first run | 4 of 16 scored27% of demand covered | Search surfacesAll · demand-weighted | 8/25/2026took 5.1s | |
| jabra3 too thin to score | 16.3 | first run | 2 of 5 scored61% of demand covered | Search surfacesAll · demand-weighted | 8/25/2026took 2.0s |
Only the most recent computation per brand and scope keeps its category detail — a recompute overwrites the previous one. Older rows stay as a record of what the score was, and of how it has moved.
Which brand are you measuring?
Pick how you want to find it, then choose the market