Head to head · bosch
Who is named higher when two brands both appear in the same answer
Visibility and head-to-head disagree
3rd on visibility, 2nd head to head. You appear less often than rivals but beat them when you both show up — a coverage problem, not a competitiveness one.
Head-to-head standing
Derived from match record alone — no chosen weights
2of 11
by head-to-head record · strength 1588 (1579–1597)
Strength
1588
Win rate
63.4%
Matches
109,260
Rivals beaten
8 / 10
League table
| Brand | Strength | Confidence | Matches | Win rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dyson | 1614 | 1594–1636 | 12,308 | 62.2% |
| boschyou | 1588 | 1579–1597 | 109,260 | 63.4% |
| aeg | 1574 | 1562–1588 | 43,180 | 59.0% |
| miele | 1524 | 1513–1535 | 60,967 | 50.1% |
| tefal | 1517 | 1489–1545 | 7,058 | 51.9% |
| neff | 1494 | 1478–1509 | 40,298 | 46.1% |
| philips | 1493 | 1476–1508 | 21,230 | 44.8% |
| braun | 1474 | 1447–1497 | 8,205 | 44.0% |
| siemens | 1470 | 1460–1481 | 92,953 | 41.0% |
| samsung | 1427 | 1410–1443 | 24,767 | 36.5% |
| bauknecht | 1324 | 1301–1349 | 20,722 | 24.4% |
bosch head to head
| Rival | Matches | Won |
|---|---|---|
| siemens | 39,136 | 71.2% |
| miele | 19,547 | 59.6% |
| neff | 14,626 | 56.7% |
| aeg | 12,589 | 46.5% |
| samsung | 7,863 | 72.2% |
| bauknecht | 5,709 | 78.6% |
| philips | 4,525 | 61.6% |
| dyson | 3,257 | 43.2% |
| braun | 1,088 | 64.3% |
| tefal | 920 | 53.6% |
Model fit
Predicted versus what actually happened
Mean error on well-populated pairs
5.6 pts
38 pairs with 300+ matches
| Pair | n | Real | Model | Off |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bosch vs siemens | 39,136 | 71% | 66% | 5 |
| bosch vs miele | 19,547 | 60% | 59% | 1 |
| siemens vs miele | 15,408 | 38% | 42% | 4 |
| bosch vs neff | 14,626 | 57% | 63% | 6 |
| siemens vs neff | 14,099 | 55% | 47% | 8 |
| bosch vs aeg | 12,589 | 46% | 52% | 5 |
| siemens vs aeg | 10,093 | 42% | 35% | 6 |
| miele vs aeg | 8,323 | 40% | 43% | 2 |
| bosch vs samsung | 7,863 | 72% | 72% | 1 |
| bosch vs bauknecht | 5,709 | 79% | 82% | 3 |
| siemens vs samsung | 5,649 | 60% | 56% | 4 |
| siemens vs bauknecht | 4,953 | 81% | 70% | 11 |
| miele vs neff | 4,816 | 43% | 54% | 11 |
| philips vs braun | 4,652 | 50% | 53% | 3 |
| bosch vs philips | 4,525 | 62% | 63% | 2 |
| miele vs samsung | 4,157 | 66% | 64% | 2 |
| philips vs tefal | 4,024 | 53% | 47% | 7 |
| aeg vs neff | 3,773 | 66% | 61% | 4 |
| miele vs dyson | 3,501 | 42% | 37% | 5 |
| miele vs bauknecht | 3,280 | 72% | 76% | 4 |
| bosch vs dyson | 3,257 | 43% | 46% | 3 |
| aeg vs bauknecht | 3,076 | 73% | 81% | 8 |
| aeg vs samsung | 2,932 | 62% | 70% | 8 |
| siemens vs philips | 2,515 | 51% | 47% | 5 |
| philips vs dyson | 2,493 | 31% | 33% | 2 |
| neff vs bauknecht | 1,873 | 65% | 73% | 7 |
| samsung vs bauknecht | 1,805 | 72% | 64% | 8 |
| miele vs philips | 1,605 | 57% | 54% | 2 |
| braun vs tefal | 1,376 | 31% | 44% | 13 |
| bosch vs braun | 1,088 | 64% | 66% | 1 |
| dyson vs samsung | 1,057 | 85% | 75% | 10 |
| philips vs aeg | 977 | 44% | 39% | 6 |
| aeg vs dyson | 963 | 56% | 44% | 11 |
| bosch vs tefal | 920 | 54% | 60% | 6 |
| neff vs samsung | 913 | 55% | 60% | 5 |
| siemens vs dyson | 613 | 29% | 30% | 2 |
| dyson vs braun | 387 | 71% | 69% | 2 |
| philips vs samsung | 329 | 41% | 59% | 18 |
| siemens vs braun | 279 | 46% | 49% | 4 |
| aeg vs tefal | 233 | 54% | 58% | 4 |
| aeg vs braun | 221 | 56% | 64% | 8 |
| siemens vs tefal | 208 | 26% | 43% | 17 |
| miele vs tefal | 200 | 53% | 51% | 2 |
| miele vs braun | 130 | 60% | 57% | 3 |
| philips vs neff | 101 | 55% | 50% | 6 |
| neff vs tefal | 45 | 69% | 47% | 22 |
| braun vs samsung | 33 | 100% | 57% | 43 |
| neff vs braun | 30 | 77% | 53% | 24 |
| tefal vs samsung | 29 | 76% | 63% | 13 |
| dyson vs neff | 22 | 32% | 67% | 35 |
| dyson vs tefal | 15 | 87% | 64% | 23 |
| philips vs bauknecht | 9 | 100% | 73% | 27 |
| braun vs bauknecht | 9 | 100% | 70% | 30 |
| tefal vs bauknecht | 8 | 75% | 75% | 0 |
Large errors on low-match pairs are expected — that is why ratings below 300 matches are suppressed.